Ongoing Service — Patent Intelligence Group

Ongoing Patent Monitoring for PE Firms & Litigation Finance

MoatWatch™ is Patent Intelligence Group’s ongoing patent monitoring service — built for two distinct investor needs. Broad portfolio surveillance for private equity firms and hedge funds. Matter-specific monitoring for litigation finance funds.

Patent Intelligence Group is an independent provider of patent monitoring for private equity firms, litigation finance funds, and investors worldwide.

Ongoing Service

MoatWatch™

Two tracks. One independent monitoring service.

PE & Hedge Funds

Litigation Finance

Our Methodology

The Patent Litigation Funding Readiness Framework™

A structured four-step methodology that takes a patent enforcement case from initial screening through complete investor-ready diligence. Each step builds on the last — so funders can enter at the right stage and exit with the confidence their investment decision requires.

Every step can be commissioned independently based on where you are in the evaluation process. A funder who has already reviewed a claim chart may only need the Litigation Viability Report. A funder evaluating a case from scratch can commission all four steps in sequence.

What Happens Without Monitoring

A competitor files a continuation patent that narrows a portfolio company's enforcement position — your deal team finds out at exit diligence

An IPR petition is filed on the funded matter's core patent — you learn about it from counsel three weeks after institution

A claim construction order significantly narrows the infringement theory — you find out in the next quarterly counsel update

A new market entrant begins practicing a portfolio company's key patents — undetected until after they've established market share

New prior art surfaces in competitor filings that could be used in an IPR against a funded matter's patents

Private Equity & Hedge Funds

Broad Portfolio Monitoring — The Entire IP Landscape

Monitors the full patent portfolio of a portfolio company across the hold period. Broad scope. Multiple patents. Competitive landscape. The question: is the IP moat intact?

New competitor patent filings in the portfolio company’s technology space — applications, grants, and assignments that could affect enforcement or licensing value

Continuation and CIP activity from competitors that could expand their IP coverage into the portfolio company’s protected space

Design-around attempts — competitor products or filings that appear designed to work around existing claims

New potential infringers entering the market that may be practicing the portfolio company’s patented technology

IPR petition filings targeting portfolio company patents — with early warning to allow strategic response

Patent health events — reexamination, reissue, expiration, and related proceedings that affect the value of specific patents

Monthly portfolio intelligence report — all findings summarized with investment implications, formatted for IC review

Litigation Finance Funds

Matter-Specific Monitoring — The Funded Case

Monitors the specific patents in a funded enforcement matter through the life of the investment. Narrow scope. Defined matter. Specific proceedings. The question: what is happening to the case I funded?

IPR petition filing targeting funded matter patents — alert upon filing with prior art assessment and impact on case value

PTAB institution decision — alert upon institution or denial with updated risk scoring and investment implications

IPR trial proceedings — ongoing coverage through oral argument and final written decision, with claim survival analysis

Claim construction orders — alert upon Markman ruling with analysis of how constructions affect the infringement theory and case value

Summary judgment, trial, and settlement developments in the district court matter

Patent health events on the funded matter’s specific patents — reexamination, reissue, related proceedings

Monthly matter intelligence report — complete summary of all developments, formatted for investment committee review

How It Works

Simple to Set Up. Always On.

MoatWatch is designed to be low-friction for clients and high-value in output. We handle the monitoring — you receive the intelligence.

Define Your Scope

1

Tell us which track applies — PE portfolio monitoring or litigation finance matter monitoring — and specify the patents, technology space, or funded matter to monitor. We configure the surveillance parameters around your specific situation.

We Activate Monitoring

2

Patent Intelligence Group activates continuous monitoring across patent databases, PTAB filings, district court dockets, and competitive intelligence sources relevant to your defined scope.

Monthly Reports Delivered

3

You receive structured intelligence reports on a monthly cadence — summarizing all developments, flagging significant activity, and explaining what each finding means for your investment position.

Act on Intelligence

4

Use MoatWatch findings to adjust hold-period strategy, respond to IPR threats, update portfolio company guidance, or inform investment committee reporting — backed by independent analysis rather than counsel summaries.

Where MoatWatch Fits

The Ongoing Layer — After Diligence Is Complete

For litigation finance, MoatWatch is the ongoing layer after the four diligence steps are done. For PE, it runs through the full hold period after the IP Assessment at close.

PE Track

IP Assessment

Full portfolio diligence at acquisition or investment.

LF Step 1

Infringer Landscape

Identify who is practicing the patent claims.

LF Step 2

Claim Chart Report

Build the technical evidence funders require.

LF Step 4

Investment Diligence

Complete investor-ready package for funders.

Ongoing

MoatWatch™

Continuous monitoring — PE portfolio or LF matter — through the life of the investment.

Who We Are

Independent Patent Diligence for Litigation Finance — Built by an Engineer and a Lawyer

Patent Intelligence Group provides independent patent litigation funding diligence for litigation finance firms worldwide. We are not a law firm. We are not a funder. We are the independent analytical layer between a patent enforcement case and the investment decision it requires.

Our founder is a New York and Texas licensed patent attorney with 20+ years of patent prosecution and litigation experience — combined with an engineering background that allows direct technical analysis of claims and accused products. That means we read claims the way a patent examiner does, evaluate prosecution history and IPR vulnerability the way a litigator does, and model damages the way an investment analyst does. Diligence you can actually structure a return against.

Our Methodology

Inquire About MoatWatch™

MoatWatch pricing is customized to your monitoring scope — the size of the portfolio, the patents involved, and the reporting cadence required. Contact us to discuss your situation and receive a tailored proposal.

Call us directly at 646-397-3003 or submit the form and we’ll be in touch within one business day.

PE & Hedge Fund Track Covers

Full portfolio patent surveillance

Competitor filings and continuation activity

Design-around detection

IPR petition monitoring

Monthly portfolio intelligence report

IPR petition through final written decision

Claim construction order analysis

District court matter developments

Monthly matter intelligence report

This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.
This field is required.

Our team will contact you within one business day. Patent Intelligence Group provides independent analytical services only.

Common Questions

Patent Litigation Funding Diligence — FAQs

Answers to the questions litigation finance firms ask most often about independent patent diligence.

What is patent litigation funding diligence?

Patent litigation funding diligence is the independent analysis conducted before a litigation funder agrees to finance a patent infringement case. It evaluates infringement strength, patent validity, damages potential, and litigation risk to determine whether a case is worth funding. Patent Intelligence Group provides structured diligence reports specifically designed to meet the evaluation standards of top litigation finance firms.

Patent litigation funding diligence is the independent analysis conducted before a litigation funder agrees to finance a patent infringement case. It evaluates infringement strength, patent validity, damages potential, and litigation risk to determine whether a case is worth funding. Patent Intelligence Group provides structured diligence reports specifically designed to meet the evaluation standards of top litigation finance firms.

Patent litigation funding diligence is the independent analysis conducted before a litigation funder agrees to finance a patent infringement case. It evaluates infringement strength, patent validity, damages potential, and litigation risk to determine whether a case is worth funding. Patent Intelligence Group provides structured diligence reports specifically designed to meet the evaluation standards of top litigation finance firms.

Patent litigation funding diligence is the independent analysis conducted before a litigation funder agrees to finance a patent infringement case. It evaluates infringement strength, patent validity, damages potential, and litigation risk to determine whether a case is worth funding. Patent Intelligence Group provides structured diligence reports specifically designed to meet the evaluation standards of top litigation finance firms.

Patent litigation funding diligence is the independent analysis conducted before a litigation funder agrees to finance a patent infringement case. It evaluates infringement strength, patent validity, damages potential, and litigation risk to determine whether a case is worth funding. Patent Intelligence Group provides structured diligence reports specifically designed to meet the evaluation standards of top litigation finance firms.

Patent litigation funding diligence is the independent analysis conducted before a litigation funder agrees to finance a patent infringement case. It evaluates infringement strength, patent validity, damages potential, and litigation risk to determine whether a case is worth funding. Patent Intelligence Group provides structured diligence reports specifically designed to meet the evaluation standards of top litigation finance firms.

Patent litigation funding diligence is the independent analysis conducted before a litigation funder agrees to finance a patent infringement case. It evaluates infringement strength, patent validity, damages potential, and litigation risk to determine whether a case is worth funding. Patent Intelligence Group provides structured diligence reports specifically designed to meet the evaluation standards of top litigation finance firms.